|
Introduction
The Companies Act 2006 (the ‘Act’)
can no longer be ignored: the longest Act in the history
of Parliament, which will have a massive impact on company
law, is now a reality. Whilst it seemed that a significant
breathing space had been provided by the government when
the Act received Royal Assent (the statement at the time
was that the Act would be ‘fully implemented’ by
October 2008, with no interim dates being given), the detailed
implementation timetable released in February has scotched
any such hopes. The result is that some of the Act
has already come into force, and a significant proportion
of it will be coming into force this October.
Remaining implementation dates are April 2008 and October
2008.
The purpose of this Article is to recap in brief on what
is already in force, and look at what has actually been
happening in practice as a result in one of the relevant
areas, electronic communications. The Article will
then go on to examine what is scheduled to take place over
the summer, in terms of consultations and so on, and then
look, again in brief, at what will be coming into force
this October. The Article will finish by setting
out what areas will be implemented on the remaining key
dates.
What is already in force?
The areas of the Act that have already come into force
can be summarised as follows:
- the provisions relating to electronic communications,
electronic filings and trading disclosures;
- the provisions implementing the Transparency Directive;
- the provisions implementing the Takeovers Directive;
and
- various miscellaneous repeals of the Companies Act
1985 (the ‘1985 Act’) relating
to directors (for example the removal of the requirements
relating to notification of share interests, the removal
of the age limit and so on).
Detailed information on these areas can
be found in the
Companies
Act section of our website and in the previous edition
of Essentially
Business.
What has happened in terms
of electronic communications in practice?
By way of brief re-cap, companies are now able to communicate
with their shareholders (and debenture-holders) electronically
(and vice-versa), provided that certain conditions are
met and consents obtained. As we advised at the time,
it is likely that most companies, in order to take advantage
of these new flexibilities fully, would need to consider
amending their articles of association (‘Articles’)
in due course and/or gaining the necessary shareholder
approvals. The
Institute of Chartered Secretaries and Administrators (ICSA)
then published some guidance on electronic communications
with shareholders – the first half of the document
summarising and interpreting the provisions, with the second
half of the document focusing on guidance and points
of recommended best practice.
So what has been happening in practice? Well it seems
that many of the smaller, and in particular the private
companies, haven’t yet made any changes to their
Articles. Reasons for this include: (i) the knowledge
that further changes to their Articles will be required
in due course when other provisions of the Act are implemented,
and so taking a decision wait and do all the amendments
in one go; (ii) the fact that their Articles already allow
for limited use of electronic communications and this is
sufficient for their purposes at present; and (iii) the
fact that shareholder consent was easily obtainable (due
to for example small numbers of shareholders), meaning
that amendments to their Articles were thereby unnecessary.
However, for the larger companies, and certainly for the
larger listed companies (which have further hoops to climb
through before they can take advantage of the new provisions),
the story is very different. A survey carried out
by the Practical Law Company examining a selection of listed
companies whose financial years ended on 31 December 2006
and whose AGM notices have been sent to shareholders, has
found that no standard approach has emerged as to whether
a shareholders’ resolution or a resolution to amend
the Articles is the preferred route, and in certain cases
both have been used. However, companies have been
actively pursuing both, in order to take advantage of the
new rules. For the sample of companies that were
examined, there appears to be a preference for the two
stage approach where the resolution at the AGM (either
approving communications by electronic means or to amend
the articles accordingly) is passed first before the company
writes to shareholders requesting their individual consent
to receive electronic communications including via a website.
However, a number of the companies have sent the request
letter to shareholders at the same time as the notice of
AGM and asked the shareholders to consent, subject to the
resolution being passed.
What will be happening over the summer?
Over the summer, the DTI will be putting draft regulations
on their website for comment as they become available. These
will set out the detailed rules necessary for many areas
of the Act. Consultations will be taking place on
the draft model Articles that have been produced for private
companies limited by shares (which will replace Table A),
private companies limited by guarantee, and public companies. Consultations
will also be taking place on transitional and savings provisions. The
DTI is also preparing useful checklists for different users
on the Act. The first one that has been prepared is relevant
for private companies, and can be found here.
Checklists for shareholders and public companies will apparently
follow. Frequently
asked questions on the Act have also been published, and
can be found here.
What is happening
in October?
As
stated above, a significant proportion of the Act will
be coming into force this October. We will be looking
at this in much more detail in the next edition of Essentially
Business, and in our seminar on 25th September (see
below). However, in brief, the provisions that will
be coming into force are as follows:
- Part 9: Exercise of members’ rights. Two
new provisions are being introduced: (i) for all companies,
members will have the right, provided the company’s
articles permit, to nominate another person to enjoy
or exercise their rights as a member; and (ii)
for ‘quoted’ companies, members can nominate
the beneficial holder of the shares “to enjoy
information rights” (i.e. to receive company
documentation and information).
- Part 10: Directors. This will include provisions
relating to: (i) codification;(ii) appointment and removal;
(iii) declarations of directors’ interests; (iv)
transactions with directors; (v) service contracts; (vi)
indemnification; (vii) definitions of director and shadow
director and persons connected with them; (viii) loans
to directors; (ix) directors’ compensation payments
for loss of office; and (x) ratification of acts of
directors. NB: provisions
relating to conflict of interests will not be coming
into force until October 2008.
- Part 11: Derivative Claims – the new statutory
procedure for members to bring a derivative action
in the name of the company against one or more directors.
- Part 13: Resolutions and meetings. This will
include (i) the ‘elective’ regime becoming
the default for private companies; (ii) the opening up
of the regime for private companies to make decisions
by written resolution; (iii) the short notice meeting
percentage being reduced; (iv) a reduced notice period
for general meetings for private companies, even if a
special resolution is to be considered; (v) ‘quoted’ companies
having to publish the results of any polls on their website,
and shareholders in ‘quoted’ companies who
hold at least 5% of voting rights or who number at least
100 shares will have the right to require an independent
report; (vii) shareholders in public companies being
able to require the company to circulate resolutions
and statements at the company’s expense; and
(viii) proxies being able to speak and vote at meetings.
- Part 14: Control of Political Donations and Expenditure.
This restates and amends the regulation of political
donations in the 1985 Act.
- Section 417 of Part 15: Contents of directors’ report:
business review – this introduces a new requirement
for quoted companies to include a forward looking statement
in their business review.
- Sections 485 to 488 to Part
16: Appointment of auditors
by a private company. There are some technical
changes.
- Part 29: fraudulent trading. The offence restates
section 458 of the 1985 Act but increases the maximum
sentence for the offence from 7 years’ imprisonment
to 10.
- Part 30: Protection of members against unfair prejudice. This
is a restatement of existing law.
- Part 32: Power of the Secretary of State to appoint
inspectors to investigate a company or its shareholders. This
will change some of the rules currently set out in
the 1985 Act.
Remainder of the Act
The subsequent implementation dates are April 2008 and
October 2008. Provisions coming into force in April
include those on company secretaries, accounts and reports,
and audit. Of more significant impact will be October
2008, when the remaining provisions will come into force,
including those on financial assistance (which will be
allowed for private companies); a company’s constitution
(pursuant to which the Articles will become the key document,
with the memorandum of association merely providing an ‘historical
snapshot’); a company’s share capital; overseas
companies; and business names.
Further information for you
Our next edition of Essentially Business,
due out in the Autumn, will cover what is happening in
October in much more detail. Flyers covering three key
areas: (i) trading disclosures and electronic communications;
(ii) directors; and (ii) meetings and resolutions, are
available from our website our offices. In
addition to this, we will be holding a client seminar on
Tuesday 25th September, from 6pm, on these areas. Invitations
will follow in due course, but we would urge all of you to
attend. In the meantime, please do get in touch with
your usual contact at Davenport Lyons with any queries
that you may have.
© Davenport Lyons 2007 All rights
reserved.
This document reflects the law and practice as at July
2007. It is general in nature, and does not purport in
any way to be comprehensive or a substitute for specialist
legal advice in individual circumstances.
|