Introduction
George Osborne's announcement at the
Conservative Party Conference that a Tory government
would abolish inheritance tax on estates worth less than £1m
was very well received in many quarters. This was obviously
tempered by the fact that, not being in government, the
intention could not be put into action. In fact,
if you listened very carefully, it was possible to detect
murmurings of appreciation of this from those with a
vested interest in the AIM market. However, relief
was only temporary.....
The proposed changes
The measures announced by the Chancellor
in his pre-budget report have dealt a double blow to
AIM. Both the planned abolition of business asset taper
relief and the planned effective increase in the threshold
at which inheritance tax applies mean the withdrawal
of significant incentives to invest in AIM companies.
Focusing on the business asset taper
relief first, this relief reduces the gains made on sales
of shares or securities, according to the length of the
period of ownership. Currently shares in qualifying AIM
companies (but not those on the main market) are classed
as 'business' assets, which attract significantly higher
rates of taper relief - these can reduce the effective
rate of tax to 10 per cent. for a higher rate taxpayer
after a holding period of two years. However,
under the government’s proposals, this taper relief
will be abolished, to be replaced by a single rate of
18 per cent. which will apply to all disposals made on
or after that date.
Moving on to the inheritance tax threshold,
Mr Darling announced that the threshold at which inheritance
tax was paid for couples would increase to £700,000
by 2010. Many companies on AIM are trading groups;
investment in such groups qualifies for a valuable 100
per cent. business property exemption from inheritance
tax provided the investment is held for at least two
years before a chargeable transfer for inheritance tax
purposes is made. It is commonly acknowledged that
this exemption has had a significant impact in encouraging
investment in AIM, as opposed to the main market or overseas
markets. With the rise in the inheritance tax threshold
reducing the need to search for tax-free investments,
AIM companies could lose investors.
The future
It is important to remember that at
this stage the changes have not yet been enacted, and
it is possible in particular that some carve-outs will
be made to the single 18 per cent. rate of capital gains
tax through lobbying over the next few months. However,
the trend certainly isn't looking good for AIM from a
tax point of view. This, coupled with the 're-birth'
of the PLUS Markets and the position of PLUS now as more
of a threat to AIM, could have an adverse effect on the
incredible rates of growth that the market has seen over
the last few years. Don't forget, however, that
the recent tightening up of the relevant rulebooks for
AIM (including the introduction of the new rulebook for
nominated advisers) has served to steady the market and
its reputation, and AIM has proved itself to be incredibly
resilient throughout the recent market turmoil.
© Davenport Lyons 2007. All
rights reserved.
This document reflects the law and practice as at October
2007. It is general in nature, and does not purport
in any way to be comprehensive or a substitute for specialist
legal advice in individual circumstances.
|