Welcome to Davenport
Lyons' Digital Rights Bulletin
20 April 2007
This 'irregular' email service will
be arriving in your inbox now and then and we hope it
will prove a useful indicator to some of the issues that
affect businesses involved in or moving towards the digital
world. Digital delivery of media content raises vital
issues for both new and traditional media operations.
We hope that our take on some of these issues, informed
by our long history of dealing with content driven problems
and disputes will be useful. Much of our focus will be
on the music, film and publishing industries and we firmly
believe that problems that arise in each of these industries
can inform on issues that may arise in the others. Music
in particular has been something of a 'guinea pig' on
digital delivery and there is much to learn about the
hurdles it has had to overcome and still faces. What
is clear is that digital delivery of media content is
with us to stay. The traditional media businesses have
had or will have to adapt or lose out. As usual we welcome
any feedback and if this bulletin is not for you, you
can ask us to stop sending it at any time.
Press Scrum
The World Association of Newspapers
("WAN") and a coalition of news agencies including Associated
Press and Reuters protested this week against restrictions
imposed by the International Rugby Board ("IRB") on press
coverage of this year's Rugby World Cup in France. The
IRB has severely limited the permitted publication of
photographs of the World Cup online, including on newspaper
websites, to a maximum of five still photos per half
and two of extra time. Also introduced were editorial
restrictions on how photographs are treated in print
publications, banning the superimposing of headline and
captions on photos if they obscure advertising in the
images, as well as limits on permitted audio-visual content
on websites and mobile devices.
This spat highlights concerns by broadcasters
that more people are tuning into large sporting events
via their computers and that this is undermining their
position to recoup their outlay on these events. Mike
Miller, the Chief Executive of the IRB, stated "It is
not really our concern if newspapers decide to expand
into non-traditional news delivery mechanisms and businesses
to bolster their reach and market share, and nor should
we change our terms and conditions and jeopardise our
sport's valuable commercial revenues in order to facilitate
their new business enterprises".
It's not only in relation to rugby that
more and more fans are looking online. It's no surprise
that in relation to any large sporting event or competition,
many of which take place over a period of days when sports
fans are just as likely to be at their desk as on the
sofa, people are heading to the internet for coverage.
It has recently been reported that Cricinfo (www.cricinfo.com)
the site which bills itself as "The Home of Cricket",
has launched a 3D animation broadcast allowing users
to view play at the Cricket World Cup in a virtual 3D
stadium. Commenting on this, Andrew Wildblood, senior
VP of sports rights broker IMG said in New Media Age "This
technology won't go away, it will only get better and
more realistic, therefore new rights may be required".
European Digital Library
Please click here to
update yourself on the latest from the European Commission
in its efforts to create a European Digital Library,
'a common multilingual access point to Europe's cultural
heritage'
Norwegian Liberal Party wants
legalised file sharing
Norway's liberal party, Venstre, has
passed a resolution to ban DRM and legalise file-sharing.
The political party proposes that consumers pay a special
fee for broadband usage or hardware storage to compensate
artists and software companies for use of their digital
products. The money would go into a fund to pay artists
or software companies according to how many times their
music or software applications have been downloaded.
Venstre's resolution is in response to growing consumer
opposition in Norway to restrictive controls on downloading
and duplicating content from the internet. Please click here for
further information.
© Davenport Lyons 2007. All rights
reserved.
This document reflects the law and practice as at April
2007. It is general in nature, and does not purport in
any way to be comprehensive or a substitute for specialist
legal advice in individual circumstances.