Newsflash: ISP's to be responsible
for preventing their services being used for illegal
P2P
5th July 2007
On 29 June 2007 a Belgian court ruled
that the Internet Service Provider ("ISP") Scarlet (formerly
Tiscali) must take responsibility for illegal file sharing
taking place on its network.
The judge in this case, brought by SABAM
(The Belgian Society of Authors, Composers and Publishers),
found there was sufficient evidence to show that the
ISP's customers were committing copyright offences. At
the end of 2004, he asked a technical expert to assess
the possibility of blocking peer to peer ("P2P") services
not exclusively used for exchanging copyright-protected
material.
When the expert filed his report on
3 January 2007 it detailed eleven solutions for the control
of P2P networks, seven of which were said to be available
to Scarlet. The judge therefore ruled that ISPs do have
the technical resources to control infringement on their
networks, and in particular pointed to filtering technology
developed by Audible Magic. Scarlet were ordered to end
copyright infringement (through P2P file sharing) of
musical works belonging to SABAM's repertoire and told
to notify SABAM of the measures implemented. They were
given six months to comply before facing a 2,500 Euros
a day penalty.
The ruling is the first of its kind
in Europe. It was previously thought that the "safe harbour" provisions
contained in European E-Commerce legislation would protect
ISPs acting as mere conduits of information. Yet the
Belgian court were unwilling to accept Scarlet's argument
that the implementation of these technical solutions
would mean they risk losing their waiver of liability
for conduit activities. The court insisted that the order
did not impose on Scarlet a general obligation to monitor
its network.
The decision looks set to be welcomed
by the international recording industry. Illegal file-sharing
is said to cause huge economic damage to the music industry
with the International Federation of the Phonographic
Industry ("IFPI") estimating there were some 20 billion
illegal files shared on P2P networks in 2006. Their Chairman
and CEO John Kennedy said of the decision:
"This is an extremely significant ruling
which bears out exactly what we have been saying for
the last two years - that the internet's gatekeepers,
the ISPs, have a responsibility to help control copyright-infringing
traffic on their networks. The court has confirmed that
the ISPs have both a legal responsibility and the technical
means to tackle piracy. This is a decision that we hope
will set the mould for government policy and for courts
in other countries in Europe and around the world.
© Davenport Lyons 2007. All rights
reserved.
This document reflects the law and practice as at July
2007. It is general in nature, and does not purport in
any way to be comprehensive or a substitute for specialist
legal advice in individual circumstances.